There is no solitude greater than the critic's, unless perhaps it be that of a tiger in the jungle...

White Elephant Blogathon

The 3rd Annual White Elephant Film Blogathon is here!

 

Miami Vice

April 02, 2009

Miami Vice

'Vice' is neither touted masterpiece nor camp classic

This was posted as part of the Third Annual White Elephant Film Blogathon.

When I first received news of my assignment for the White Elephant Blog-a-thon, I thought, “Oh shit!” To the unassuming, movie-going masses, Miami Vice (2006) was just another one of those adrenaline-packed summer blockbusters with a built-in TV audience in mind. To cinephiles, however, it was “a Michael Mann film” – four words that underscore just how polarizing Mann’s films are. To his admirers, Mann is an impressionistic visionary who subverts genre expectations. To his detractors, Mann is the exact opposite: Hollywood’s Emperor without clothing, if you will.

Oddly enough, as a self-proclaimed bleeding heart cinephile, I belong to neither camp - and this viewing of Miami Vice (my second exposure to the Mann oeuvre; the first one was Heat), only reaffirmed my status as a detached non-partisan. Miami Vice was a frustrating film experience, one muddled with as much complaints as compliments. I guess this may explain why prior attempts to articulate my contradictory feelings into coherent paragraphs have since been aborted. And so without further ado, here are some of the fragmented notes taken, during the viewing of the film:

1) One common criticism often leveled against Mann is that he favors “style over substance.” While I am not exactly a Mann apologist, I am more inclined to disagree with this sentiment. One of the things Mann does really well, as a filmmaker, is create mood. I love the first two minutes of the film, wherein the camera opens with the dark blue sea and then, bubbles upwards towards the surface and latches onto the velocity of Sonny and Rico’s speedboats. A few moments later, he catches sight of Sonny and Rico mingling in a neon-lit nightclub – you know – the sleazy, go-to-place where sweaty, anonymous torsos gyrate against one another until dawn. Call me a sucker, but I love it whenever a filmmaker takes the time to establish a strong sense of place as well as dynamic.

2) For a film aware and heightened by the gritty nuances of everyday life – particularly, missed and/or fleeting connections (Sonny’s short-lived romance with drug czar ally Isabella, blocked cell phone signals Sonny and Ricardo experience during pivotal undercover operations, etc.) – Miami Vice sure is glamorous! Colin Farrell’s scruffy Sonny is brooding, sleazy… and inexplicably sexy. What can I say? The truck driver moustache, greasy hair, and five o’clock shadow works wonders for Colin. Ah, the magic of the movies!

3) The bookends of Miami Vice – the beginning as well as the end – are great. The middle parts, unfortunately, lag. Watching the cat-and-mouse game between Sonny and Rico and the evil drug cartels unfold for god knows how many hours, I wondered if a drinking game would have sufficed. We drink every time we see a foreboding Bald Neo Nazi in the car. We chug again whenever we see that bug-eyed drug lord with the receding hairline, whisper and nod quietly to his bespectacled Right Hand Man in a sleek state-of-the-art meeting room. And just because we want to drink ourselves silly and get sloshed for the night, we chug two shots every time we see a shower sex scene - interchangeably between Sonny or Rico and their significant others - that dashes our fragile expectations (“Hold on. Is there going to be a kinky Golden Shower on the way?!?! ... [sighs] Aw, dammit.”)

Comments

Andrew said...

"I'm a fiend for mojitos."

Tram said...

"Probability is like gravity. You cannot negotiate with gravity."

Rasselas said...

"And no one will look for you. Including me."

Rick Gershman said...

From your review:

" 'a Michael Mann film'– four words that underscore just how polarizing Mann’s films are. To his admirers, Mann is an impressionistic visionary who subverts genre expectations. To his detractors, Mann is the exact opposite..."

It's an interesting statement, because I find Mann polarizing too... he polarizes ME. I'm a big admirer of several of his films, while a couple of others--this Miami Vice remake is a perfect example--are a gigantic mess. But at least it's an ambitious mess.

Tram, if Heat and Vice are the only Mann films you've seen, you're definitely missing out. I'm partial to Manhunter, which was the first time Red Dragon was filmed--it's two decades old and a bit dated in music and fashions, but it's great filmmaking. Plus I actually prefer Brian Cox's take as Hannibal Lecter (in this film, though, his name is oddly misspelled Lecktor).

But Mann's best film, IMHO, remains Thief, with on of James Caan's finest performances. It's the one film where Mann definitely emphasizes substance (and story) over style. Even more impressively, it's a film where Jim Belushi has a supporting role and somehow it doesn't destroy the entire film. Seriously, though, check it out. It's excellent.

robix said...

The more frustrating thing about Mann, to me, is that he's fallen in love with video technology that looks like he bought in Best Buy. His last few films (from Collateral on) just don't look professional. Public Enemies looks to be more of the same, and I find it maddeningly distracting. I've more or less accepted that people will use video, but no one ever showed him how to use it right (unless he went to Lucas for tips).

The Insider is the one must-see Mann film if you see another. Not only is it an effective, incredibly well made drama about censorship, hypocrisy and corporate malfeasance, it's also Pacino's last great role, and I have to believe that Russell Crowe actually won his Oscar as a make up call for losing out here to Kevin Spacey's dead-fish impersonation in American Beauty.

Post a comment