There is no solitude greater than the critic's, unless perhaps it be that of a tiger in the jungle...

White Elephant Blogathon

The 2nd Annual White Elephant Film Blogathon

 

The Lake House

April 18, 2007

The Lake House

Reeves and Bullock are at it again!

Armed with pens, paper, an irresponsible utter disregard for the integrity of the space time continuum, and a magic mailbox, Keanu Reeves and Sandra Bullock embark on another romantic adventure (if you could call Speed that...) in the film The Lake House. This time, instead of being stuck within the confines of a speeding bus they're stuck two years apart. Using the mailbox outside of the lake house that they occupied at different points in time, they're able to send letters back forth and strike up a relationship. Reeves plays an architect turned project manager on a construction site and Bullock is a doctor. Both are pretty unbelievable in a film chock full of unbelievable occurances.

Unbelievable coincidences, sappy storylines, and magical mailboxes should come as no surprise in a remake of a Korean film. Korea is infamous for its melodramas and romances, a phenomenon that some sociologists have thought is a reaction to Korea's dark history in the latter half of the 1900s. I saw bits of the original film, Il Mare, once one my mom was watching it so when trailers for this film started showing up on TV I knew immediately what it was. I wondered why they hell anyone felt it was necessary to remake that movie and watching The Lake House (twice!) did little to answer my numerous questions.

The story is largely told through goofy scenes of the daily lives of both characters with the letters that they're writing back and forth being read. There are even scenes where a split screen is utilized as both characters are in the same place two years apart, reading eachother's letters but unable to be together. In the voiceovers that accompany much of the film, Bullock's acting is passable but Reeves' sounds even more confused than he usually does. The viewer might share in his confusion too as the story jumps back and forth through time and one catches up with the other in one time frame but is still receiving letters back in the other and all hell breaks loose. The film is weird and it's frustrating expending any amount of brain power on a film that offers so little in terms of rewards.

The one reward that there is in the film is the lake house itself. Constructed largely of glass, the house has a large tree growing inside it with a fancy roof that opens up to let the tree get some sunlight. However, the questionable level of privacy offered by a glass house and the lack of any sort of sewage system (according to IMDB) makes this superficially beautiful lake house just as unappealing as the film it inhabits.

Comments

Greg said...

Ben, I just got around to reading this. It's a nice enough review, but I think you should have done yourself the service of informing your readers of the clever reason you actually sat through this shitfest.

Ben said...

Greg, I wish there was a clever reason I sat through this shitfest. Yes, it was done as part of the house double feature but I had seen the film before I concocted that idea...

Terri Taylor said...

I thought this film was a bit confusing at first; you must be attentive to each scene, however, I thought it was very well-done. I enjoy time travel movies. Unlike "Somewhere in Time," the characters are alive at the close of the film. Needless to say both films are great, and include Christopher Plummer. My husband watched the movie with me and we both had the same conclusion -- it was a great movie. If we are to over analyze and disect each minute of the film, it would be less enjoyable. I think the film industry just wishes for us to lose ourselves for a short while and enjoy the thrill, not scrutinize every detail. It is not based on historical data, it is just a film to enjoy with someone you love and while you are watching it, you can be grateful for what you have. I give this film a thumbs up!

Ben said...

Fair enough Terri. I myself prefer to do whatever I can to suck the joy out of every film I watch and in rare cases be pleasantly surprised by my inability to do so :)

Post a comment






Your Ad Here