March 11, 2006
Heartbreaking Works of Staggering Genius
Robert Bresson
The title's a little much you say? Tell that to the throngs of critics and film professors who are constantly heaping praise upon a man known as the "patron saint of cinema." I myself have sinned and am ashamed to say that I've spent more time reading about Robert Bresson than I have actually watching his films. I've only seen Diary of a Country Priest, Au Hasard Balthazar, and most recently: The Trial of Joan of Arc. As a result, I don't have much business writing a piece about him but I couldn't help myself after being so moved by his portrayal of Joan of Arc's ordeal.
Bresson is one of those directors that critics adore but tend to stump most audiences. Upon viewing his films they can come off as agonizingly slow and uneventful. But when you realize that Bressons style is largely a lack of stylishness, it all comes together. Two of the most important qualities a director can possess are restraint and maturity. Bresson's work is the epitome of that belief. His films seem simple and the few that I've seen can seem like they're building up to nothing but in the end you realize that you've been taken on an absolutely transcendental journey. His films are utterly profound in their apparent simplicity.
Bresson is best known for striving for a truth in cinema. A truth that he felt was lacking in theatre because it relied on the performances of actors to convey feelings and emotions. He thought that actors had too many tricks and were so wrapped up in technique that they couldn't convey what he wanted.
What seperated film from theatre for him was that you could convey feelings and ideas through purely cinematic techniques such as composition. He was the most pure of filmmakers. He eschewed music as much as he could and rarely used camera movements. I've heard that he also never used wideangle or zoom lenses because he felt that they distorted the world. Maybe if he had been trying to tell an effective story different lenses would be important but for him there was something much more important at stake because of this he only used a "normal lens" which sees the world in the same way the human eye does.
And of course, there were his actors. Bresson only used non-professional actors whom he forced to redo scenes over and over to the point of exhaustion until all traces of "performance" were stripped away. This would allow the camera to penetrate the raw emotions of the characters and it works to stunning effect. His films are sincere without being earnest and they're moving without being manipulative.
The strongest influence on Bresson seems to have been his Catholicism. Salvation, redemption, suffering, and the nature of the human soul are common themes in his work. His films also often deal with the struggle between creating your own path in life or submitting to some sort of destiny. Yet, Bresson's works transcend any religious pigeonholing. They hit you on a human level because the moral and philosophical situations depicted in his works are so familiar.
Jean Luc Godard described Au Hasard Balthazar as, "the world in an hour in a half." He couldn't be more correct. Bresson brings you a world you're completely familiar with, yet with his austere style he shows it to you in a way you've never experienced. He doesn't judge, he merely opens your eyes to things that were always in front of you. As stated in Diary of a Country Priest and demonstrated in Bresson's films, in his world, all is grace.

Comments
Brother of Ben said...
You've sparked my intersted, suggest me your favorite of his and i'll netflix it.
Posted by: Brother of Ben | March 12, 2006 10:36 PM
jguitar said...
Welcome to Bresson mania. There's a lovely essay written by William Johnson--a review of Balthazar from the time the film came out. It's a wonderful corrective to the tendency to look for too much "spirit" in Bresson's work. Instead, Johnson argues, Bresson is a materialst filmmaker. He communicates through an obsessive focus on the limitless physicality of everyday life, the end result of endless tiny moments. I don't have it in front of me to cite it, but I can dig it up. It completely opened my eyes to a new way of seeing Bresson--and I've seen every film.
Posted by: jguitar | March 16, 2006 3:07 PM
Ben said...
Thanks for the reply J. I tried to find the essay you mentioned but Google isn't doing me much good. If you happen to come across a copy of it online I'd love to read it.
Also, soon after I posted this I saw Pickpocket which is my favorite work of his yet. I thought it was absolutely brilliant and one of the best films I've seen in a very long time.
Posted by: Ben | March 16, 2006 3:58 PM
jguitar said...
Pickpocket is great--that beautiful ballet of the three pickpockets working together. Wait until you get to A Man Escaped.
I don't think the Johnson review is online, because I looked for it earlier. However, I just looked up the citation info. It's from Film Quarterly, volume 20, issue 3, Spring 1967, pages 24 to 28. I don't remember the title, but I'm sure that NYU's library would have it.
Another good one to track down is the James Quandt-edited book called simply Robert Bresson--from the series of books by the Cinematheque Ontario.
I look forward to more posts on this excellent blog.
Posted by: jguitar | March 16, 2006 6:46 PM
andrew said...
Just watched L'Argent. Hate to be a prude but it was not too enchanting. Profound, sure, but profound about what? It shakes my foundations for thinking about 'art' to the point that my standards are foggy. Maybe that's my problem more than Bresson's. I suppose one must appreciate his efforts and his craft, but his messages...?
Posted by: andrew | March 30, 2006 2:37 AM
TBN said...
I love A Man Escaped and Au hasard Balthazar immensely. Pickpocket was really good. And while Lancelot du Lac pales in comparison to early Bresson, it has its merits.
But then I recently saw Mouchette at a revival house. Argghh. Why does it have to be so sadistic? :(
Speaking of which, Mouchette will be released some time this year on DVD by Criterion.
On a semi off-tangent note, this remains to be the best
analysis of A Man Escaped I've yet to read.
Posted by: TBN | May 8, 2006 10:08 PM
Frank Blaakmeer said...
The article by William Johnson was reprinted in: Bellone, Julius (ed.), Renaissance of the film, New Yoyrk: Collier, pp. 32-40.
Watch out for the Bresson bibliography that is going to be published at http://www.mastersofcinema.org/bresson/ this summer. It will contain appr. 2500 references.
Posted by: Frank Blaakmeer | April 23, 2007 6:57 AM